State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 80 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. Forrest (2006), State v. Clay (1998)
1 federal appellate · 80 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Batson v. Kentucky · Gregg v. Georgia · Hernandez v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state must prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. However, in determining the defendant’s guilt or innocence, you are instructed that (an intoxicated) (or) (a drugged) condition (whether) from (alcohol) (or) (drugs) (or) ([Identify other sub stance.]) will not relieve a person of responsibility for his conduct (unless such condition was involuntarily produced.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson · State v. Newlon“A defendant's failure to challenge the State's race-neutral explanation in any way waives any future complaint that the State's reasons were racially motivated, and leaves nothing for this Court to review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he scope of cross-examination and the determination of matters of witness credibility are largely within the discretion of the trial court.” State v. Taylor, 944 S.W.2d 925, 935 (Mo. banc 1997).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.