Damron’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2016
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Prado Oil & Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission · Your Host, Inc. v. Commissioner · National Labor Relations Board v. Atkinson Dredging Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Jesse Jones Sausage Co. · Meyer Dairy, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘Workers on temporary layoff or on leave who have a reasonable expectation of recall are counted as employees. An employee has a ‘reasonable expectation of recall’ when he/she understands, through notification or through industry practice, that his/ her employment with the employer has been temporarily interrupted and that he/ she will be recalled to the same or to a similar job.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“who may reasonably be expected to experience an employment loss”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.