Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 945 F.2d 344 - Bohrer v. Commissioner

Bohrer v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
March 2010
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably Duffie v. United States (2010), United States v. Fleming (1994)

19 federal appellate · 3 district ·

260199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1092 · 26 U.S.C. § 1234 · 26 U.S.C. § 165

Relies on Gregory v. Helvering · Knetsch v. United States · Frank Lyon Co. v. United States · Rita v. United States · Breininger v. Sheet Metal Workers International Ass'n Local Union No. 6

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] transaction will be accorded tax recognition only if it has economic substance which is compelled or encouraged by business or regulatory realities, is imbued with tax-independent considerations, and is not shaped solely by tax avoidance features that have meaningless labels attached.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`incurred in any transaction entered into for profit' as required by I.R.C. § 165(c)(2).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any loss sustained during the taxable year and not compensated for by insurance or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.