Miller v. Campbell County’s Empirical Analysis
945 F.2d 348 · 1991
Citation profile
31 federal appellate · 14 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently March 2021 · most notably Seamons v. Snow (1996), Dodd v. Hood River County (1995)
31 federal appellate · 14 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Graham v. Connor · Parratt v. Taylor · Daniels v. Williams · Boddie v. Connecticut · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[bjecause the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment imposes very specific obligations upon the government when it seeks to take private property, we are reluctant in the context of a fac tual situation that falls squarely within that clause to impose new and potentially inconsistent obligations upon parties under the substantive or procedural components of the Due Process Clause. It is appropriate in this case to subsume the more generalized Fourteenth Amendment due process protections within the more particularized protections of the Just Compensation Clause.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The Fifth Amendment does not prohibit the government from taking its citizens' property; it merely prohibits the government from taking property without paying just compensation.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Because the plaintiffs have not yet been turned away empty-handed, it is not clear whether their property has been taken without just compensation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.