Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 945 F.2d 441 - Cookish v. Powell

Cookish v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis

945 F.2d 441 · 1991

Citation profile

65
cited by 65 later decisions
3
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 17 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably Sanchez v. Pereira-Castillo (2009), Anderson v. Romero (1995)

23 federal appellate · 17 district · 9 state decisions

2301991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Bell v. Wolfish · Turner v. Safley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) inadvertent, occasional, casual, and/or restricted observations of an inmate’s naked body by a guard of the opposite sex did not violate the Fourth Amendment and (2) if the observation was other than inadvertent, occasional, casual, and/or restricted, such observation would (in all likelihood) violate the Fourth Amendment, except in an emergency condition.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A "strip search,” though an umbrella term, generally refers to an inspection of a naked individual, without any scrutiny of the subject's body cavities. A “visual body cavity search” extends to visual inspection of the anal and genital areas. A "manual body cavity search” includes some degree of touching or probing of body cavities. Blackburn v. Snow, 771 F.2d 556 , 561 n. 3 (1st Cir.1985).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Certainly by the time of this search in 1987, the trend, if not the clearly established law, was that an inmate’s constitutional right to privacy is violated when guards of the opposite sex regularly observe him/her engaged in personal activities, such as undressing, showering and using the toilet.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.