Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 945 F.2d 716 - Temkin

Temkin’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

185
cited by 185 later decisions
8
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 22 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 185 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service Co. (1996), City of Lancaster v. Chambers (1994)

26 federal appellate · 22 district · 11 state decisions

8801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Estelle v. Gamble · Parratt v. Taylor · Daniels v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 185 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The burden then shifts to the nonmoving party to come forward with facts sufficient to create a triable issue of fact.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “1) the chase continued for a significant period of time over a ten mile area; 2) the chase continued at a very high rate of speed; 3) the case was initiated because of a minor violation; 4) the police already had, at a minimum, a partial identification of the license plate of the suspect vehicle; and 5) the chase violated [a sheriff’s department order] because [the officer] failed to maintain radio contact with his supervisor throughout.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “while disturbing and lacking in judgment”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.