Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 945 N.E.2d 201 - Sasser v. State

Sasser v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wilson v. State · Clark v. State · Sallee v. State · Munford v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To qualify as fundamental error, an error must be so prejudicial to the rights of the defendant as to make a fair trial impossible. To be fundamental error, an error must constitute a blatant violation of basic principles, the harm or potential for harm must be substantial, and the resulting error must deny the defendant fundamental due process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.