Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 945 NE2D 205 - Green v. State

Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Baumgartner v. State · Jacobs v. State · Atteberry v. State · Jordan v. State · Montgomery v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, we neither reweigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses. Instead, we consider only the evidence supporting the conviction and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. If there is substantial evidence of probative value from which a reasonable trier of fact could have drawn the conclusion that the defendant was guilty of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt, then the judgment will not be disturbed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to draw, prepare, complete, counterfeit, copy or otherwise reproduce, or alter any written instrument in whole or in part.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the transaction was completed when he swiped the credit card and the electronic point of sale system accepted it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.