A criminal judgment for criminal trespass entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
Decided 2020-06-29
Filed 06/29/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2020 ND 133
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Francisco Eugenio Bethancorth, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20200020
Appeal from the District Court of Dickey County, Southeast Judicial District,
the Honorable Daniel D. Narum, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mary E. Depuydt, Special Assistant State’s Attorney, Wishek, ND, for plaintiff
and appellee.
Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Bethancorth
No. 20200020
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Francisco Eugenio Bethancorth appeals from a criminal judgment
entered after a jury found him guilty of criminal trespass. He argues his degree
of intoxication prevented him from knowing that he was not licensed or
privileged to enter or remain in a dwelling or highly secured premises, and the
district court erred by denying his motion for acquittal. We summarily affirm
under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Lisa Fair McEvers
Gerald W. VandeWalle
1