Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 945 P.2d 1189 - May v. May

May v. May’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2021

15 state decisions

1101997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish Commission · Stadtfeld v. Stadtfeld · Hamburg v. Heilbrun · Huhn v. Quinn · Foster v. Foster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statutory interpretation is a question of law, so our standard of review is de novo. If the conclusion of law is in accordance with the law, we affirm it; if it is not, we correct it.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The commissioner as to matters pending in the court is a subordinate officer of the court. He is not a District Judge who alone possesses the power to preside over a District Court. There can be no such court in the absence of a qualified judge de facto or de jure. The Court Commissioner is neither.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the Commissioner's summary of evidence and the proposed findings and recommendations, the basis for such proposed findings and recommendations, the objections of the parties, if any, [and] the pertinent parts of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.