Caporoz v. Labor Commission’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2012
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena · Benson v. Empire State Bank · State v. Menzies · State v. Copeland · Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the Legislature has granted an agency discretion to determine an issue, we review the agency's action for reasonableness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the duty and the full power, jurisdiction, and authority to determine the facts and apply the law”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“not bound, under principles of horizontal stare decisis, to apply the less deferential correction-of-error standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.