Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 945 P2D 795 - Gallant v. Gallant

Gallant v. Gallant’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 2018

15 state decisions

70199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Merrill v. Merrill · Kowalski v. Kowalski · Lone Wolf v. Lone Wolf · Martens v. Metzgar · Richmond v. Richmond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Determination of net income is a question of fact and is reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard. A factual finding will be deemed clearly erroneous if the reviewing court is `left with a definite and firm conviction on the entire record that a mistake has been made....'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The award of attorney's fees in a divorcee action is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court ... [and] will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is arbitrary, capricious, manifestly unreasonable, or stems from an improper motive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “motion for reconsideration apprised the court of the additional information and arguments he would have presented in his reply.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.