Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 945 So. 2d 448 - Ex Parte Carson

945 So. 2d 448 - Ex Parte Carson’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte United Service Stations, Inc. · Ex Parte Ziglar · State v. Shelby · 807 So. 2d 534 - Ex Parte Carter · 748 So. 2d 231 - Reed v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘ “[t]he writ of mandamus is a drastic and extraordinary writ, to be ‘issued only when there is: 1) a clear legal right in the petitioner to the order sought; 2) an imperative duty upon the respondent to perform, accompanied by a refusal to do so; 3) the lack of another adequate remedy; and 4) properly invoked jurisdiction of the court.’ Ex parte United Serv. Stations, Inc., 628 So.2d 501, 503 (Ala.1993); see also Ex parte Ziglar, 669 So.2d 133, 134 (Ala.1995).” Ex parte Carter, [ 807 So.2d 534 ,] 536 [(Ala.2001) ].’ “Ex parte McWilliams, 812 So.2d 318, 321 (Ala.2001).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.