Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 945 SW2D 219 - State v. Simmang

State v. Simmang’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2010

13 state decisions

60199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n individual in an automobile is highly mobile.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “detained on the basis of the unsubstantiated suspicions of an anonymous caller of an unknown reliability and without specific and articulable facts to justify the stop,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.