Commonwealth v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 2015
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Hicks · Hatchett v. City of Glasgow · City of Owensboro v. Noffsinger · Asher v. G. F. Stearns Land & Lumber Co. · Security Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Mayfield v. Nesler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fundamental rule is that for an order to be final and appealable, it must adjudicate all claims of the parties at the time the order was entered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“final or appealable judgment is a final order adjudicating all the rights of all the parties in an action or proceeding ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.