Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

945 S.W.2d 43

Hinkle v. Hinkle

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1997

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1997-04-29

Decided 1997-04-29

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2In this dissolution proceeding, husband raises five points on appeal. Among other things, he contends the trial court erred in denying his oral motion for continuance and granting custody of their child to wife.

¶3We have examined the record and briefs. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. Rule 84.16(b).

¶4The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

/945/sw2d/43 · .json · Public domain