Smith v. Al Lockhart’s Empirical Analysis
946 F.2d 1392 · 1991
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1997
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Laws v. Armontrout, Warden · Laws v. Armontrout · Vasquez v. State · Chandler v. Armontrout
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Persuasion and compromise are the processes by which juries are intended to reach their decisions. Otherwise, jurors would be polled directly after the close of trial — not allowed to discuss the case among themselves to arrive at a verdict acceptable to them all.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davis v. State“[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bolander v. Iowa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.