Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 946 F.2d 1497 - United States v. Dewitt

United States v. Dewitt’s Empirical Analysis

946 F.2d 1497 · 1991

Citation profile

175
cited by 175 later decisions
9
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

106 federal appellate · 18 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 175 later decisions — most recently March 2022 · most notably United States v. Botero-Ospina (1995), United States v. Soto (1993)

106 federal appellate · 18 district · 13 state decisions

10401991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Rakas v. Illinois · Florida v. Royer · Berkemer v. McCarty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 175 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'clear and positive testimony that consent was unequivocal and specific and freely and intelligently given,'”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether the officer's action was justified at its inception, and whether [the action] was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “failure to object to the continuation of the search under these circumstances may be considered an indication that the search was within the scope of the consent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.