946 F2d 1566 Reno Minority Broadcasting Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission
946 F.2d 1566
292 U.S.App.D.C. 86
RENO MINORITY BROADCASTING CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee.
Nevada Television Corporation, Intervenor.
RENO COMMUNITY BROADCASTING COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee,
Nevada Television Corporation, Intervenor.
PAGE ENTERPRISES, INC. (KAME-TV), Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee,
Nevada Television Corporation, Intervenor.
Nos. 90-1485, 90-1486 and 90-1488.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
June 28, 1991.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 28, 1991.
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Appeals from an Order of the Federal Communications Commission.
Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
These consolidated appeals were considered on the record from the Federal Communications Commission and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. After full review of the issues presented, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the appeals do not warrant a further opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 14(c). Substantially for the reasons stated by the Commission in its memorandum opinion and order, see 5 FCC Rcd 5561 (1990), it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order from which these appeals have been taken be affirmed.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15(b)(2).