Depree v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
946 F.2d 784 · 1991
Citation profile
54 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Chapman v. AI Transport (2000), United States v. Irey (2010)
54 federal appellate · 1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Bruton v. United States · Giglio v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have long held that an issue not raised in the district court and raised for the first time in an appeal will not be considered by this court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'by luck or happenstance [ ] the State obtains incriminating statements from the accused after the right to counsel has attached.' " Kuhlmann, 477 U.S. at 459, 106 S.Ct. at 2630 (quoting Maine v. Moulton, 474 U.S. 159 , 176, 106 S.Ct. 477, 487, 88 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985)). 186 "There is, by necessity, no bright-line rule for determining whether an individual is a government agent for purposes of the sixth amendment right to counsel .... At a minimum, however, there must be some evidence that an agreement, express or implied, between the individual and a government official existed at the time the elicitation takes place.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To establish his claim, [the defendant] `must show (1) that a fellow inmate was a government agent; and (2) that the inmate deliberately elicited incriminating statements from' him.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.