Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

946 F.2d 884

Docket No. 91-7096.

Davis v. Williams

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 5, 1991. Decided Oct. 21, 1991.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-10-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2001

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re John Rodgers Burnley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-10-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-89-575-L)

Bobbie R. Davis, appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Bobbie R. Davis appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Williams CA-89575-L (W.D.Va. Apr. 25, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/946/f2d/884 · .json · Public domain