Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

946 F.2d 886

Docket No. 91-2154.

Michael Sindram v. James L. Ryan Robert F. Sweeney

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 30, 1991. Decided Oct. 23, 1991.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-10-23

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 2001

1 district ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re Gary M. Silvers

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-10-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Bartimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-90-468-HAR)

Michael Sindram, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Michael Sindram appeals from the district court's order denying his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sindram v. Ryan, No. CA-90-468-HAR (D.Md. July 5, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/946/f2d/886 · .json · Public domain