Blumenthal v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2014
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (§ 2 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2611 (§ 101 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2617 (§ 107 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2619 (§ 109 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 701 (Employment Opportunities for Individuals With Disabilities Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12117 (§ 107 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · National Labor Relations Board v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n · Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. · Gomez v. Illinois State Board of Education · Roman v. United States Postal Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] private plaintiff who qualifies as an 'eligible employee' has no basis to seek relief by asserting a violation of § 2619’s notice requirement.” (citations omitted)); Jessie v. Carter Health Care Center, Inc., 926 F.Supp. 613, 617 (E.D.Ky.1996) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“); Hendry v. GTE North, Inc., 896 F.Supp. 816, 828 (N.D.Ind.1995) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.