946 N.W.2d
Volume 946 — North Western Reporter, Second Series
5 opinions
- 946 N.W.2d 505A.R. Audit Services Inc. v. Young (2020)
District court order denying motion for relief under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) is summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7).
- 946 N.W.2d 666Frans v. Waldinger Corp. (2020)
- 946 N.W.2d 704State v. Scott (2020)
There is no requirement for the district court to advise defendants they may plead not guilty based on the defense of double jeopardy. The defense of double jeopardy is not presentable to the jury unless there is a question of fact. Rule 803(24), N.D.R.Ev., which provides an exception to certain hearsay statements made by a child about sexual abuse, does not apply to non-hearsay testimony.
- 946 N.W.2d 707Laufer v. Doe (2020)
A party seeking recovery of property damage allegedly caused by a pesticide application must strictly comply with statutory notice requirements under N.D.C.C. § 4.1-33-18.
- 946 N.W.2d 718Schroeder v. State (2020)
The State is immune from liability for claims relating to an injury directly or indirectly caused by the performance of a public duty, including the State's duty to maintain the interstate and keep it in good and safe condition for general public use. The State is immune from liability for claims resulting from a snow or ice condition on a highway except when the snow or ice condition was affirmatively caused by a state employee's negligent act.