Spunaugle v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2012
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ross v. Oklahoma · Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services · Dennis v. Dennis · Kliewer v. New Jersey · Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Severance is also required when the State introduces the confession of a non-testifying co-defendant which inculpates another co-defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Lm · Mireles v. State“Mutually antagonistic defenses occur when each defendant attempts to exculpate himself and inculpate the co-defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Lm · Mireles v. State“to believe one is to disbelieve the other.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Lm · Mireles v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.