Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

946 So. 2d 1152

Vanover v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 2006

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-12-20

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2016

8 state decisions

Relies on Golden v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-12-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1James R. Vanover appeals from an order denying his “Notice of Inquiry,” in which he requested copies of his plea and sentencing transcripts free of charge, so that he may make a collateral challenge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We treat this appeal as a petition for writ of mandamus and deny the petition. See Golden v. State, 870 So.2d 167, 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)(“Beyond the record provided for a direct appeal, [a prisoner] is not entitled to free transcripts to assist in the preparation of either a post-conviction motion or a petition for extraordinary relief.”).

STONE, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
/946/so2d/1152 · .json · Public domain