Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 946 SO2D 1235 - Sramek v. State

Sramek v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Giles v. Renew · Hunt v. State · 853 So. 2d 595 - Hagan v. State · Mix v. State · Hill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The prosecution of indirect criminal contempt is governed by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840. Florida courts have held that failure to strictly follow the dictates of that rule is fundamental error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he fact that a defendant has already served his sentence [for indirect criminal contempt] does not render his appeal moot.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.