¶1AFFIRMED. See LaMarr v. Lang, 796 So.2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (noting trial court enjoys wide discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence); Fla. Pottery Stores, Inc. v. Am. Nat’l Bank, 578 So.2d 801, 804 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (“To be within ... the provision in the statute of frauds concerning agreements not to be performed within the space of one year ..., it must be shown that neither party’s performance was intended to be complete within one year.”).
946 So. 2d 1290
Sheldon v. Mullins
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 2, 2007
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-02-02
Relies on 578 So. 2d 801 - Florida Pottery Stores of Panama City, Inc. v. American Nat. Bank · 796 So. 2d 1208 - LaMarr v. Lang
Decided 2007-02-02