¶1Writ denied. The record, as supplemented with the transcript of the October 22, 2004- evidentiary hearing, which followed remand of the case for that purpose by this Court in State v. Lee, 03-0032 (La.6/27/03), 852 So.2d 987, is sufficient to show that the defense did not raise a bona fide concern regarding the defendant’s competency to proceed, and that the trial judge never found that reasonable grounds existed for doubting defendant’s competency sufficient to require that prosecution be halted until the issue was resolved in accord with La.C.Cr.P. arts. 641 et seq. Therefore, the court of appeal need not have conducted a nunc pro tunc determination of the defendant’s competency.
946 So. 2d 174
State v. Lee
Decided January 12, 2007
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2007-01-12
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2012
1 state decisions
Relies on State v. Lee
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2007-01-12
View the full empirical analysis of this case →