Sturkey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brown v. State · 279 So. 2d 156 - Stringer v. State · 667 So. 2d 622 - Atterberry v. State · 421 So. 2d 1025 - Oates v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We will only reverse under that standard if the admission of the evidence results in prejudice or harm to the opposing party, or if it adversely affects a substantial right of the party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The admission or suppression of evidence is within the sound discretion of the [circuit court] and will not be reversed unless there is an abuse of that discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and (2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.