State v. Knowles’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2014
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Refre v. United States · State v. Antwine · Erickson v. Illinois · State v. Parker · Texas v. New Mexico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) Whether the statement was, in fact, voluntary and unresponsive [to the prosecutor’s questioning if the prosecutor asked the question] ... or whether the prosecutor “deliberately attempted to elicit” the comments; 2) Whether the statement was singular and isolated, and whether it was emphasized or magnified by the prosecution; 3) Whether the remarks were vague and indefinite, or whether they made specific reference to crimes committed by the accused; 4) Whether the court promptly sustained defense counsel’s objection to the statement, ... and instructed the jury to disregard the volunteered statement; and 5) Whether in view of the other evidence presented and the strength of the state’s case, it appeared that the comment, “played a decisive role in the determination of guilt.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Riggins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.