Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

947 A.2d 1124

Yost v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 21, 2008

Supreme Court of Delaware · decided 2008-04-21

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2008

1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-04-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

MICHAEL YOST, Defendant Below, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee.

No. 32, 2008.

¶1Supreme Court of Delaware.

April 21, 2008.

¶2

ORDER

¶3MYRON T. STEELE, Chief Justice.

¶4This 21st day of April 2008, it appears to the Court that, on March 19, 2008, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for the appellant's failure to diligently prosecute his appeal by not filing his opening brief and appendix in this matter. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

¶5NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

/947/a2d/1124 · .json · Public domain