State v. DeJesus’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crawford v. Washington · Bell v. Wolfish · Davis v. Washington · Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]t is only when evidence is marginally relevant and enormously prejudicial that a trial justice must exclude it.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“that a trial justice's discretion to exclude evidence under Rule 403 must be used sparingly[,]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.