Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 947 F.2d 11 - Project Basic v. Kemp Phoenix-Griffin Group II Ltd

Project Basic v. Kemp Phoenix-Griffin Group II Ltd’s Empirical Analysis

947 F.2d 11 · 1991

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
5
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 26 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably United States v. Voss (1996), Armstrong

41 federal appellate · 26 district · 6 state decisions

3601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shillitani v. United States · United States v. Alaska · White v. Illinois · International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n · In re Disbarment of Morrison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “civil contempt will lie only if the putative contemnor has violated an order that is clear and unambiguous”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the party enjoined must be able to ascertain from the four corners of the order precisely what acts are forbidden”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “id. at 17 (quoting International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'n, 389 U.S. 64 , 76, 88 S.Ct. 201, 208, 19 L.Ed.2d 236 (1967)) nor were”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.