Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 947 F.2d 1232 - United States v. Dancy

United States v. Dancy’s Empirical Analysis

947 F.2d 1232 · 1991

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on United States v. Leon · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · United States v. Prout · Gower v. Farmers Home Administration · United States v. Singleton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A correct street address in a search warrant, even if no other description is given, is particular enough to withstand constitutional scrutiny. The warrant must describe the place to be searched in enough detail to for the executing officer (1) to locate the premises with reasonable effort, and (2) to be sure the wrong premises are not mistakenly searched. United States v. Prout, 526 F.2d 380 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 840 [ 97 S.Ct. 114 , 50 L.Ed.2d 109 ] (1976). A correct street address meets both prongs of the test.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.