United States v. Carr’s Empirical Analysis
947 F.2d 1239 · 1991
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably United States v. DiSomma (1991), United States v. Herrera-Soto (1992)
15 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3145 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. R Canon · Texas International Company Arthur Lipper Corporation v. Texas International Company · United States v. DiSomma · 759 F. Supp. 685 - United States v. Bailey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the defendant meets the conditions of release set forth in § 3143(a)(1)'— namely that there is clear and convincing evidence that he does not pose a risk of either flight or danger to the community if released; and (2) “it is clearly shown that there are exceptional reasons why such person’s detention would not be appropriate.””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“avenue for exceptional discretionary relief”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A) a crime of violence; (B) an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death; (C) an offense for which a maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act ( 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.), the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act ( 21 U.S.C. § 951 et seq.), or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46 U.S.C.App. § 1901 et seq.)....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.