Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

947 F.2d 940

Docket No. 91-2066.

Dc Comics Inc v. Brands

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Sept. 16, 1991. Decided Oct. 25, 1991.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-10-25

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2001

21 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-10-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CA-90-112-C-C-P)

Richard Byron Whisnant, Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, P.A., Charlotte, N.C., for appellants.

Gerald Blum, New York City, Leon Zimmerman, Salisbury, N.C., for appellees.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

DC Comics, Inc. and Warner Bros., Inc., appeal from the district court's order awarding attorneys' fees in the amount of $1,500. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. DC Comics, Inc., v. New Brands, CA-90-112-C-CP (W.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/947/f2d/940 · .json · Public domain