Barbara Kaiser v. Johnson & Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2020
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 355 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360C (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360K (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. · Wyeth v. Levine · Freightliner Corp. v. Myrick · Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the relevant consumers here are pelvic-floor surgeons”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.