Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 947 FSUPP 175 - Callahan v. A.E v. Inc.

Callahan v. A.E v. Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
June 2014
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Douglas Oil Company of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest · Greene v. Massey · Bulow Auersperg v. Bulow · Memorial Hospital v. Shadur · Wm. T. Thompson Co. v. General Nutrition Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Discovery in an antitrust case is necessarily broad because allegations involve improper business conduct.... Such conduct is generally covert and must be gleaned from records, conduct, and business relationships.”). . In re Auto. Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litig., No. MDL-1426, 2004 U.S. Dist. Lexis 29160, at (E.D.Pa. Oct. 29, 2004). . Id. at . . Id., at . . Id. . No. 99-197TFH, 2001 WL 1049433 , at (D.D.C. June 20, 2001). . Id. . Id. . See, e.g., In re Aspartame Antitrust Litig., 2008 WL 2275531 , at (holding that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.