Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

947 So. 2d 1190

Docket No. 1D06-3998.

Brock v. State

Richard Earl BROCK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 24, 2007.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2007-01-24

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2010

2 state decisions

Relies on 737 So. 2d 1102 - Schubert v. State · 746 So. 2d 1249 - Rumph v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-01-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard Earl Brock, pro se, Petitioner.

¶2Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4By timely petition, Richard Earl Brock seeks a belated appeal of a June 8, 2006, order denying his motion for postconviction relief after evidentiary hearing. He alleges that upon receipt of the trial court's order, he timely mailed a letter to *1191 his counsel of record requesting that she file a notice of appeal. In response to his subsequent notice of inquiry, however, the circuit court clerk informed Brock that a notice of appeal had not been filed.

¶5The state opposes the petition for belated appeal, relying on an affidavit of Brock's counsel stating that she has no record of receiving Brock's letter requesting that an appeal be initiated. Based on counsel's affidavit, the state asserts that the petition for belated appeal should be denied inasmuch as counsel denies being requested to file an appeal, or in the alternative, an evidentiary hearing should be conducted.

¶6We conclude that Brock is entitled to a belated appeal, and that there is no need for an evidentiary hearing. If Brock's timely letter did not reach counsel, this exceptional circumstance is sufficient to warrant the granting of a belated appeal. See Rumph v. State,746 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). An evidentiary hearing would be required only if the state established a good faith basis for disputing Brock's sworn allegation that he timely mailed the letter requesting an appeal. See Schubert v. State,737 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). The state has not done so, and Brock is therefore entitled to the relief he seeks.

¶7Accordingly, the petition seeking a belated appeal of the June 8, 2006, order denying Brock's motion for postconviction relief in Escambia County Circuit Court case numbers 1996-CF-001141A, 1996-CF-004898A, 1996-CF-004899A, 1996-CF-005065A, and 2002-CF-002589A, is granted. Upon issuance of mandate, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the circuit court for treatment as a notice of appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).

¶8PETITION FOR BELATED APPEAL GRANTED.

¶9VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

/947/so2d/1190 · .json · Public domain