Frew v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 437 So. 2d 1388 - McCrae v. State · 940 So. 2d 1280 - Hyacinthe v. State · 931 So. 2d 928 - Mancebo v. State · 741 So. 2d 1146 - Wright v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(f) Successive Motions. A second or successive motion may be dismissed if the judge finds that it fails to allege new or different grounds for relief and the prior determination was on the merits or, if new and different grounds are alleged, the judge finds that the failure of the movant or the attorney to assert those grounds in a prior motion constituted an abuse of the procedure governed by these rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. WAITER v. State“does not apply when the previous motion was summarily denied or dismissed for legal insufficiency”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Spera v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.