947 So. 2d 279 - Outerbridge v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Neil v. Biggers · 567 So. 2d 237 - Johnston v. State · 568 So. 2d 1173 - Roundtree v. State · Wells v. State · 530 So. 2d 694 - Davis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether under the `totality of the circumstances' the identification was reliable even through the confrontation was suggestive.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Even when a prosecutor has made an impermissible comment ... a showing of prejudice [is required] to warrant reversal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he standard of review that appellate courts must apply to lawyer misconduct during opening statements or closing arguments is whether the natural and probable effect of the improper argument is to create unjust prejudice against the accused so as to result in a decision influenced by the prejudice so created.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.