Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 947 So. 2d 964 - Coleman v. State

947 So. 2d 964 - Coleman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 208 So. 2d 886 - Carr v. State · 469 So. 2d 68 - Edwards v. State · Taylor v. State · State v. Heard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If any director, agent, clerk, servant, or officer of any incorporated company, or if any trustee or factor, carrier or bailee, or any clerk, agent or servant of any private person, shall embezzle or fraudulently secrete, conceal, or convert to his own use, or make way with, or secrete with intent to embezzle or convert to his own use, any goods, rights in action, money, or other valuable security, effects, or property of any kind or description which shall have come or been intrusted to his care or possession by virtue of his office, place, or employment, either in mass or otherwise, with a value of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) or more, he shall be guilty of felony embezzlement, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be imprisoned in the Penitentiary not more than ten (10) years, or fined not more than Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), or both.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We do not so construe the statute. It is our opinion that the language employed by the legislature refers to trustees, factors, carriers, or bailees of both artificial and natural persons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “any number of officers, trustees, or managers, by whatever name known,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.