Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 947 SW2D 181 - State v. Hall

State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1999
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · James Edward Kennedy v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden · State v. Ashby · Duchac v. State · State v. Denton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[R]esolution of a double jeopardy punishment issue under the Tennessee Constitution requires the following: (1) a Blockburger analysis of the statutory offenses; (2) an analysis, guided by the principles of Duchac, of the evidence used to prove the offenses; (3) a consideration of whether there were multiple victims or discrete acts; and (4) a comparison of the purposes of the respective statutes. None of these steps is determinative; rather the results of each must be weighed and considered in relation to each other.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.