Ex Parte Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Nobles v. Johnson (1997), Rodriguez v. State (2002)
4 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Armadillo Bail Bonds v. State · French v. State · Grimes v. State · Lopez v. State · Johnson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right and shall never be suspended.”). 3 .See Tex. Const, art. I, § 12 (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Articles 11.07 and 11.071 both include similar restrictions on the filing of subsequent applications for writ of habeas corpus with both statutes becoming effective September 1, 1995. Both contain provisions that the merits of a subsequent application may not be considered unless the application contains sufficient facts establishing that certain conditions have been met.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In light of our holding above that Article 11.071's provisions are the Legislature's enactment effecting and implementing the constitutional right of writ of habeas corpus, we are constrained to hold that such provisions in the Code of Criminal Procedure are indeed procedural and are thus outside the purview of the "retroactive law" prohibition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fowler v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.