Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 948 F.2d 117 - Barbier v. Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc.

Barbier v. Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

948 F.2d 117 · 1991

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 8 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2024 · most notably Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. (1995), Dh Blair Co Inc Dh v. Gottdiener Dh J (2006)

24 federal appellate · 8 district · 5 state decisions

5801991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University · Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc. · Lassiter v. Department of Social Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`if a ground for the arbitrator's decision can be inferred from the facts of the case,'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In a diversity action, or in any other lawsuit where state law provides the basis of decision, the propriety of an award of... damages for the conduct in question... [is a] question[] of state law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “courts generally will not look beyond the lump sum award in an attempt to analyze the reasoning processes of the arbitrators.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.