Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

948 F.2d 1284

Docket No. 91-6640.

Washington v. Er Sutton

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Shelly WASHINGTONv.E.R
  • SUTTON; William Hanhamv.Reggie Moss; Joyce McLaughlin

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Oct. 30, 1991. Decided Dec. 5, 1991.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Vandyke v. Island Creek Coal Co.

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-90-460-CRT-H)

Shelly Washington, appellant pro se.

Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Shelly Washington appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Washington v. Sutton, No. CA-90-460-CRT-H (E.D.N.C. July 31, 1991). We deny Washington's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/948/f2d/1284 · .json · Public domain