Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 948 F.2d 1305 - Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Empirical Analysis

948 F.2d 1305 · 1991

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

40 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1996), Western Resources, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (1993)

40 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co. · Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “offer more than a conclusionary statement that the existence of systemwide benefits renders it unjust to allocate facilities costs incrementally.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “show[ ] that the incremental facilities produce specific, system-wide benefits....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “explicitly consider the cost shifting that its order might effect.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.