Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 948 F.2d 1546 - Mason v. Texaco, Inc.

Mason v. Texaco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

948 F.2d 1546 · 1991

Citation profile

168
cited by 168 later decisions
9
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

82 federal appellate · 36 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 168 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Phelps v. Hamilton (1997), Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Department (1999)

82 federal appellate · 36 district · 14 state decisions

11601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. · Quern v. Jordan · Arizona v. California · Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 168 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[w]hen a court decides upon a rule of law, that decision should continue to govern the same issues in subsequent stages in the same case.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “only if the evidence points but one way and is susceptible to no reasonable inference which may support the opposing party's position.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A punitive damage claim is not an independent cause of action or issue separate from the balance of a plaintiff's case.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.