Arkla Exploration Co. v. Norwest Bank of Minneapolis, National Ass'n’s Empirical Analysis
948 F.2d 656 · 1991
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2011
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hein v. Ruti-Sweetwater, Inc. · Morton Booth Co. v. Tiara Furniture, Inc. · Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of Tulsa · Earnest, Inc. v. LeGrand · Reserve Oil, Inc. v. Dixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“§ 548.6(C)’s location in the Lien Act after section 548.4(C). Indeed, section 548.6(C) is the final section of the Lien Act. The established rule in Oklahoma is that if there is any conflict between two sections of a statute, the last in order of position must prevail. Thus, the priority rule set forth in section 548.4(C) must be read as restricted by the protections provided by section 548.6(C) for persons with interests under the Oklahoma UCC.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.